Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages influence outcomes following rotator cuff repair in the non-Medicaid population.

BACKGROUND: Prior investigations have utilized various surrogate markers of socioeconomic status to assess how health care disparities impact outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR). When taken as individual markers, these factors have inconsistent associations. Medicaid insurance status is an accessible marker that has recently been correlated with less optimal outcomes after RCR. Socioeconomic disparities exist within the non-Medicaid population as well and are arguably more difficult to characterize. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) uses seventeen socioeconomic variables to establish a spectrum of neighborhood health care disparity. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages, quantified by ADI, on 2-year patient reported outcome scores following RCR in the non-Medicaid population. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2020 was performed. All procedures were performed by a group of 7 surgeons at a large academic center. Patient demographics and comorbidities were collected from charts. Rotator cuff tear size was assessed from arthroscopic pictures. ADI scores were calculated based on patients' home addresses using the Neighborhood Atlas tool. The primary outcome measure was American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A linear regression analysis with covariate control for age and patient comorbidities was performed. RESULTS: There were 287 patients with a mean age of 60.11 years. The linear regression model between ADI and 2-year ASES score was significant (P = .02). When controlling for both age and patient comorbidities, every 0.9-point reduction in ADI resulted in a 1-point increase in the ASES score (P = .03). Patients with an ADI of 8, 9, or 10 had lower mean 2-year ASES scores than those with an ADI of 1 (87.08 vs. 93.19, P = .04), but both groups had similar change from preoperative ASES score (40.17 vs. 32.88, P = .12). The change in ASES score at 2-years in our study surpassed all established minimal clinically important difference values irrespective of ADI. CONCLUSION: Patients with greater levels of disparity in their home neighborhoods have worse final ASES scores at 2 years, but patients significantly improve from their preoperative state regardless of social disadvantages. This is the first study to the authors' knowledge that examines ADI and outcomes following RCR. Providers should be aware that patients with higher ADI scores may have inferior preoperative shoulder function. The results of this study support the utilization of primary RCR in applicable tears regardless of socioeconomic status.

Great Toe Interphalangeal Fusion for Hallux Valgus Interphalangeus Deformity in Young Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to examine indications, radiographic outcomes, and clinical complications for primary arthrodesis of the great toe interphalangeal (IP) joint in young patients. BACKGROUND: Hallux valgus interphalangeus deformity of the great toe is uncommon in the pediatric population and often requires fusion of the IP joint. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients, ages 8 to 19 years, who underwent operative fusion of the great toe IP joint, and had >1 year radiographic follow-up was performed. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine indications for surgery, concomitant procedures, success of fusion, complications, and need for revision procedures or elective hardware removal. Differences between pre and postradiographic outcomes for the hallux valgus angle, IP angle, and intermetatarsal angle were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (31 feet) were included in the analyses. The average age at fusion surgery was 14.9 years (SD ± 2.3) with a mean follow-up visit of 35.2 months. The most common indications for fusion of the great toe IP joint were pain and deformity. Kirschner wire fixation was utilized in 7 cases, with the remaining 24 cases fixed with a single retrograde cannulated screw. Fifty-five concomitant toe and foot procedures were performed in 21 feet (68%) to address additional foot and toe deformity. Successful fusion occurred in 30 of 31 toes after the primary fusion. Patient satisfaction with the toe position and diminished pain were high (94.1%). Significant improvement was noted in the measure of the IP angle ( P < 0.001), with minimal clinical change in the hallux valgus angle ( P = 0.24) or the intermetatarsal angle ( P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hallux valgus interphalangeus of the great toe was successfully managed with the fusion of the IP joint. Single screw fixation or the use of Kirschner wires led to similar outcomes. Hardware-related issues with the use of screws were the most common adverse outcome. Patients should be made aware of the possible need for hardware removal after fusion utilizing screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-a retrospective case series.

Clinical outcomes and return to play in softball players following SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain due to labral tears and biceps tendonitis is commonly found in softball players. Surgical options include labral repair and biceps tenodesis. Although past studies are limited by heterogeneous study groups from multiple sports, this is the first study that assesses clinical outcomes and return to play rates for fast-pitch softball players. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and return to play for fast-pitch softball players treated for a superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tear and recalcitrant biceps tendonitis with a biceps tenodesis compared with a traditional SLAP repair. We hypothesized that the biceps tenodesis would have comparable outcomes with a faster return to play compared with SLAP repair. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on fast-pitch softball players treated surgically for SLAP tear, recalcitrant biceps tendonitis, or a combination between 2001 and 2019 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were fast-pitch softball players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair with greater than 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria involved slow-pitch softball players, patients with less than 2-year follow-up, and patients who had undergone concomitant procedures on the ipsilateral shoulder at the time of SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis. Follow-up was either self-reported through OBERD, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO)-managing software, or achieved over the phone. Follow-up data included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Andrews Carson Score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score, Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, and our institution-specific return-to-play questionnaire. We statistically compared players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair, and compared pitchers with position players using Student t tests and Fisher exact test with statistical significance determined to be P < .05. RESULTS: From 60 eligible patients identified, follow-up outcome data were successfully captured for 47 (78%). Of the 18 SLAP repair patients, 17 (94%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.9 months. Of the 29 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis, 27 (93%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.1 months. Statistical analysis of PRO scores for each group found no significant differences between any of the measures used to evaluate patient outcomes, including no statistical difference in pitchers compared with position players. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes between SLAP repairs and biceps tenodesis procedures among our study group of fast-pitch softball players. There was no significant difference between RTP times between the 2 groups.